The Third Sunday of Advent in Year C (2015)

Eco-Justice Commentary on the Common Lectionary for Year C (2015)

Commentary by Dennis Ormseth

Prayer Petitions by Pastor Ingrid Arneson Rasmussen

Hymn Suggestions by David Sims

 

The Third Sunday of Advent in Year C (December 13, 2015)

Zephaniah 3:14-20 

Isaiah 12:2-6 

Philippians 4:4-7

Luke 3:7-18 

 

Rejoice!  Rejoice!  It is the Third Sunday of Advent and the readings all agree:  it is time to rejoice.  It is a liturgical tradition (Gaudete Sunday).  And the readings give us ample reason to rejoice. After three chapters of gloomy judgment from the prophet Zephaniah,  for instance, our first lesson breaks out with several of them:

 

            the Lord has taken away the judgments against you

                        he has turned away your enemies (3:15).

The Lord, your God, is in your midst, a warrior who gives victory;

he will rejoice over you with gladness,

he will renew you in his love;

he will exult over you with loud singing

as on a day of festival.

I will remove disaster from you, so that you will not bear reproach for it.

The king of Israel, the Lord, is in your midst; you shall fear disaster no more. . . .

At that time I will bring you home, at the time when I gather you; for I will make you renowned and praised among all the people of the earth, when I restore your fortunes before your eyes, says the Lord. ( 3:15-20)

 

The psalm reading from Isaiah 12 doubles on the theme with its "with joy you will draw water from the wells of salvation . . . . Sing praises to the lord, for he has done gloriously; let this be known in all the earth. " (Isaiah 12:3, 5); and the second lesson from Philippians 4 redoubles it:  "Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, Rejoice." 

 

Two primary reasons for all this joy, as we read these texts, are, first, removal of fear of disaster (Zephaniah 3:15, 18b), connected in the first lesson with return of the people from exile ("at that time I will bring you home, at the time when I gather you" Zephaniah 3: 20), and in the second lesson with the coming near of the Lord ("Do not worry about anything . . . ." Philippians 4:5); and secondly, due to high expectations of the presence of the Lord amidst the  people (Zephaniah 3:15, 17, 18; Isaiah 12:6; Philippians 4:5).  We will see that the Gospel for the day contains both of them as well. Because we read these scriptures in the season of Advent, our attention is naturally drawn to the second of these reasons, expectation of the presence of the Lord. For the sake of care of creation, however, it is important that we attend here to both, removal of the fear of disaster first, and then, secondly, the expectation of the Lord's presence.

 

The specific disaster mentioned in the Gospel, "the wrath to come," is of particular interest to us because it includes the destruction of forest: "Even now the ax is lying at the root of the trees" (Luke 3:9a). Yes, this is a metaphor for judgment against those who came out to John the Baptist in order to avoid that wrath: "every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire (3:9b)." But for early readers of Luke, we want to suggest, the force of this metaphor would have depended at least in part on the actual destruction of trees which they witnessed in the Roman occupation of Palestine. As Barbara Rossing points out, the Jewish author Josephus, contemporaneous with Luke, laments

 

. . . the horror of destruction of the landscape of Jerusalem and the surrounding countryside by the Roman armies . . . . Rome's deforestation of conquered lands was notorious. Both Josephus and Aelius Aristides use the same Greek word, "make naked" (gymnos; verbal form, gymnoo), to describe Rome's stripping of forests. Josephus laments the beautiful countryside around Jerusalem that was logged by the Romans to construct massive wooden siegeworks and embankments:

 

[Caesar] at once gave the legions permission to lay waste the suburbs and issued orders to collect timber . . . . So the trees were felled and the suburbs rapidly stripped [gegymnoto] (Josephus War 5.264).

 

Aelius Aristides admires Rome's power to strip distant forests "bare" (gymnos). The huge logs that he sees arriving on ships from Asia are evidence of Rome's global commercial hegemony:

 

So many merchants' ships arrive here, conveying every kind of goods from every people every hour and every day, so that the city is like a factory common to the whole earth. It is possible to see so many cargoes from India and even from Arabia Felix, if you wish, that one imagines that for the future the trees are left bare [gymna] for the people there and that they must come here to beg for their own produce (Aelius Aristides Orations 26.12).

 

Roman devastation of the landscape, Rossing concludes, was a significant aspect of its imperialism and injustice, noteworthy for us "in a time when global deforestation is an increasing problem" (Barbara R. Rossing, "River of Life in God's New Jerusalem: An Eschatological Vision for Earth's Future," in Christianity and Ecology, ed. by Dieter T. Hessel and Rosemary Radford Ruether. Camridge: Harvard University Press, 2000, p. 211-12).

 

Concern on the part of John the Baptist's audience about the "ax lying at the root of the trees" would have also been reinforced by biblical tradition, of course. From the beginning to the end of the Scriptures, trees are powerful symbols of life. The tree with its seed is there at the beginning in Genesis both as primal life (1:29) and as weighty symbol of the good life (2:9); and it is there in the closing vision of John's apocalypse, Revelation 22:2, again with its "twelve kinds of fruit, producing its fruit each month;" and all along the way in between, the tree is the enduring symbol of life blessed by God. The death of a tree, by the same token, is a sign of loss of blessing, or as here in our Gospel for this Sunday, of divine judgment on the people. It is particularly significant to note in this connection that for the prophet Isaiah (whose book, as we saw in our comment on the readings for the Second Sunday of Advent, is such a rich resource of models and metaphors for Luke's narrative),  the tree represents the nation in both judgment and blessing as recurrent event. In Isaiah 6, lacking comprehension and understanding the people refuse to "turn and be healed." "How long, O Lord?" cries the prophet. God replies,

 

"Until cities lie waste without inhabitant,

   and houses without people, and the land is utterly desolate;

until the Lord sends everyone far away,

   and vast is the emptiness in the midst of the land. 

Even if a tenth part remain in it, it will be burned again,

    like a terebinth or an oak

            whose stump remains standing

            when it is felled." (6:11-13a)

 

If for the prophet there is still hope, here at the beginning of his book it is faint hope: "The holy seed is its stump" (6:13). At the end of the book, on the other hand, the metaphor is used to bespeak exuberant expectation:

 

They shall not build and another inhabit;

  they shall not plant and another eat;

for like the days of a tree shall the days of my people be,

  and my chosen shall long enjoy the work of their hands. (65:22)

 

From Babylon to the Roman Empire, from Isaiah's to Luke's audience, historical contexts  and textual connections combine to make "an ax lying at the root" an ominous sign of threatening disaster—material, social, and religious.

 

In our comment on the reading for the Second Sunday, we noted the importance of Luke's dependence upon Isaiah for natural metaphors that could be readily appropriated and understood by Gentile readers not familiar with Mosaic traditions.  These metaphors help his contemporary readers make the connections to our context as well: the "ax lying at the root" signals impending disaster for our generation also, not only with respect to deforestation, but with its associated contribution to the threat of climate change. Loss of forests, particularly the large forests of the tropical regions of the earth, is one of the major causes of the increase of carbon dioxide in the earth's atmosphere. And as Larry Rasmussen argues in his insightful essay "Why Trees?",  loss of our arboreal companions on earth threatens to close off a main source of  "meaning and a way of standing upright in the world." Trees, he writes,

 

entertain the journey of the spirit—of forest peoples and others. They are the subject of story, poetry, painting, and sculpture and the site and substance of things religious. They are, then, essential to both the basic needs of civilization and its flowering. Trees of life are life.

     The dependence is profound. Trees do hold up the sky! More precisely, without them and other green plants, "sky" would not be. Every single breath every single human has ever taken or will take depends on trees and other green plants. Oxygen is the work of trees, not the nurse and hospital supply room. In fact, in earth's slow womb trees together with other plants created the very conditions that eventually made for life as we know it. The coevolution of plants, air, water, and animals depends on the first-listed of these as much as any. And trees, by absorbing carbon dioxide and producing oxygen, link air, water, and biota (living things) together in the unity that continues to make for life. The Native American legend is thus quite exactly the case, even when the language is mythic: "The sky is held up by the trees. If the forest disappears, the sky, which is the roof of the world, collapses. Nature and man then perish together." All trees are literally trees of life (Larry L. Rasmussen, Earth Community Earth Ethics, Maryknoll, New York:  Orbis Books, 1996, p. 213-4; the quotation is from Shridath Ramphas, Our Country, the Planet:  Forging a Partnership for Survival, p.65).

 

No civilization, no matter how culturally or technologically advanced, has any substitute.   One can therefore understand, Rasmussen insists,

 

why people, especially people who have lived close to trees in undeniable dependence, have pictured the axis mundi, earth's axis itself, as a tree. Or have seen in the canopy of trees the cosmos in its infinity and the arch of heaven. Or have found in tree life the power of all life:  of fertility and growth, of seasons of change, or survival against all odds, of beauty, and of death and regeneration.

 

Trees bear profound religious significance in that they bring heaven and earth together. They offer a "glimpse of God as Other and as Thou . . . . They bring the far God nigh, and they do so in ways we know the other as genuinely other and not ourselves in disguise." At the same time and of "direct moral import," trees

 

help disclose that we are located in nature, amidst deep kinship and deep difference in the same moment. Nature is in us as essential relationship, and this relationship is not peripheral: the relationship with the other constitutes our being itself. Deeper appreciation of difference—the 'otherness" of the other—thus goes hand in hand (or hand in branch!) with a sense of the underlying kinship of all things together (Rasmussen, pp. 215-16).

 

In conclusion, Rasmussen too turns to the prophet Isaiah, who, he suggests, "with characteristic prophetic passion for earth's redemption," offers a "picture of the just, sustainable society" that, as we have seen, includes "in passing—or more likely not in passing—the days of a tree" (Isaiah 65:22; Rasmussen, p. 217).

 

John the Baptist, we are suggesting, preached repentance and reformation of life to those who sought to escape the impending disaster they saw on the horizon of their community's existence under Roman occupation and Jewish resistance. We are also suggesting that this preaching is relevant to our situation in the early twenty-first century, as we confront the threatened disaster of deforestation and climate change. When John's hearers asked him, "What then shall we do?", however, his answers concerned matters of social justice; deforestation as such was not among them, and of course neither was climate change. Nevertheless, the combination in this text of implied forest destruction with toleration of poverty, dishonest tax collection, and police extortion,  makes sense in terms of an indictment of behaviors for which the "brood of vipers" might well have  had occasion to repent, as more or less passive or even willing collaborators with the Roman occupation forces, their identity as Jews ("children of Abraham") notwithstanding. 

 

The "wrath to come" these people sought to escape was perhaps associated in the minds of Luke's early readers with the destruction of Jerusalem during the Jewish Wars, as it appears Luke intended it to be (21:23; cf. Luke Timothy Johnson, The Gospel of Luke. Collegeville, Minnesota: The Liturgical Press, 1991, p. 324). We clearly catch sight here, in any case, of a society on the verge of impending disaster, from which they might very well have been impelled to flee when news reached them of John's preaching in the region of the Jordan River. And John's counsel to them was just as clearly to stay with their community while making the changes in their behavior that Luke lists: sharing clothing and food with the poor, fair taxation, and honest government. These are not irrelevant to the development of solutions of our ecological crisis:  poverty, financial manipulation and corrupted regulatory enforcement are all factors that contribute to environmental loss. Furthermore, similarly posed changes in our behavior and policies regarding forest and energy conservation are obviously helpful and necessary responses to the crisis, if nonetheless insufficient. It is often observed that moral persuasion in the face of impending disaster has not proved adequate to motivate changes in society powerful enough to reverse environmental destruction, particularly not on the global scale of massive deforestation and climate change. Hence, it is the religious aspect of John's preaching that strikes us as the more important and promising contribution of these readings to care of creation.

 

At the outset of this comment, we noted that along with fear of disaster, there was a second theme of equal importance, one more likely to be picked up here in the season of Advent with its call for joy: expectation of the presence of the Lord, the drawing near of God. In the Gospel, this is the third part of John the Baptist's three-part sermon, after the call to repentance and the reformation of life, a response to the question of his audience as to whether he might be the Messiah: One who is more powerful than he is coming, he says, one who will "baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. His winnowing fork is in his hand, to clear his threshing floor and to gather the wheat into his granary; but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire." We understand that this one is Jesus, empowered by the Holy Spirit, but why "Spirit and fire"? Commentators have suggested a number of interpretations of '"the Spirit and fire," as Alan Culpepper notes in his commentary on the Gospel of Luke:

 

(1) fire describes the inflaming, purifying work of the Spirit; (2) the repentant will experience the judgment of fire; (3) since the Greek term for "Spirit" can also mean "wind,' the meaning is that Jesus' baptism will bring the judgment of a mighty wind and fire; (4) as might be implicit in the first option, "Spirit" or "wind" and "fire" reflect the Christian interpretation of the Pentecost experience; or (5) John saw in Spirit and fire the means of eschatological purification:  the refiner's fire for the repentant and destruction for the unrepentant. The last combines elements of (2) and (3) and fits both the historical context of John's preaching and the literary context in which the saying about winnowing follows (R. Alan Culpepper, The Gospel of Luke: Introduction, commentary, and Reflections. The New Interpreter's Bible, Volume IX, Nashville: Abingdon Press, 85-86).

 

The combination of (2) and (3) commends itself most to us as well, but for a reason more in accord with (4), the Pentecost experience, which is not in the strictest reading an experience of "eschatological purification,"  but rather of empowerment of the community for the Spirit's mission of bringing the Gospel to the whole earth.

 

In our view, the factor of judgment has been overemphasized.  There is judgment, here, of course, but there is also new life in John's promise of the coming of one with Spirit/wind and fire.  As we have been instructed to expect by our other readings on this Sunday, there is reason here for joy as well as dismay and repentance: the disaster may occur, but that's not the end of the story. The narrative moves forward to catch a glimpse of the beginning of the restoration of creation. As Culpepper explains, "At the harvest, grain was gathered to a threshing floor, where the farmer would pitch the grain into the air with a winnowing fork. The wind would blow away the light chaff, but the grain itself would fall back to the floor where it could be gathered for use" (Culpepper, p. 86).

 

Supportive background for this reading of the narrative is to be found, again, in Luke's major source, the prophecy of Second Isaiah. As we noted in our comment on the readings for the Second Sunday of Advent, YHWH's status as creator had come in Second Isaiah to rise above all other roles ascribed to the deity. As we wrote, "The creator of all is 'above' all. God creates both darkness and light, the old and the new. YHWH is a divine singularity, incomparable and exclusively divine, whose creative reach knows no bounds” (quoting William P. Brown, The Seven Pillars of Creation: The Bible, Science, and the Ecology of Wonder, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, p. 219). If YHWH's power was sufficient to move mountains, John asserts that it is also powerful to raise up new children of Abraham, which goes to the chief point here, the gathering of the people of God to do the work of God (3:8; cf. Johnson, p. 65, where he quotes Luke 1:37, "Nothing is impossible for God," and comments, 'This is hyperbole, but barely: it reflects the conviction that resurrection of the dead and creation from nothingness are both within God's power," and that "the 'people of God' for Luke will not be one defined by biological descent but by God's gift of the Spirit and by faith.")

 

We also saw in our comment previous to this that "If Luke's narrative of the life of Jesus begins with flattened mountains, it will lead to water flowing up in the desert, so that nothing is lacking for the new beginning of a  new creation." And as we noted, following Brown again, Luke clearly understood that for Second Isaiah,"

 

the "comfort" YHWH offers the people of Israel as they regather "dirties itself with transforming the desolate land into a veritable garden paradise." The prophet's language is ''rich with metaphors and images drawn from the realm of horticulture." His discourse covers a remarkable range of botanical diversity, from the lowly brier (55:13) to the most majestic trees, the cedar of Lebanon (41:19; 44:14) . . . . 'Second Isaiah' contains a veritable catalogue of flora.” Creation accordingly occurs not only from high, with God “single-handedly creating light and life, darkness and woe,” but also “emerges from below, from the ground up” (Brown, p. 206).

 

So the gardener, or better in this instance, the farmer, comes with winnowing fork in hand to enlist wind and fire in preparation of grains for both harvest feast and new planting of seed—as the prophet had written, "the holy seed is [the tree's] stump." (Isaiah 6:13; cf. above). Water is already at hand, available from 'the wells of salvation (Isaiah 12:3) and the Jordan river for the baptism of repentance; with the wind and fire brought by this farmer,  new earth lies ready to be dug from the threshing floor. The primordial elements needed for new creation are thus gathered and all the earth awaits the day when "all flesh shall see the salvation of God."

 

What precisely this might mean for the earth and its people as we face forest removal and climate chaos remains, indeed, to be "fleshed out."  But with expectation of this gardener's planting, there is truly marvelous reason this Sunday for all of God's creation to rejoice.  As announced in our first reading from Zephaniah 3, God is bent on restoring God's people to their home in creation! As we attend with Pope Francis to “Care for our Common Home,” we are encouraged to wait for our Lord's coming with hope for both our human neighbors and their habitat in God's creation, all together. Fear of disaster, and a call for joy, we note,  the dynamic tension of these texts,  is replicated for our time in Laudato Si.'  His version of the “ax lying at the root of the trees” is the creativity and power of modern technology.  “Nuclear energy, biotechnology, information technology, knowledge of our DNA, and many other abilities which we have acquired,” he writes,

 

 have given those with the knowledge, and especially the economic resources to use them, an impressive dominance over the whole of humanity and the entire world. Never has humanity had such power over itself, yet nothing ensures that it will be used wisely, particularly when we consider how it is currently being used (Par. 104)

 

Handed over to the blind forces of the unconscious, of immediate needs, of self interest, and of violence,” our freedom fades and “we stand naked and exposed in the face of our ever-increasing power, lacking the wherewithal to control it” (Par. 105). The “technocratic paradigm”, which “exalts the concept of a subject who, using logical and rational procedures, progressively approached and gains control over an external object,”  leads us “to lay our hands on things, attempting to extract everything possible from them while frequently ignoring or forgetting the reality in front of us” (Par. 106).  With globalization of its application, technology “tends to absorb everything into its ironclad logic, and those who are surrounded with technology “know full well that it moves forward in the final analysis neither for profit nor for the well-being of the human race,” that “in the most radical sense of the term power is its motive---a lordship over all.” (Par. 108).  As it has come to dominate both economic and political life, “we fail to see the deepest roots of our present failures, which have to do with the direction, goals, meaning and social implications of technological and economic growth” (Par. 109):

 

Once the human being declares independence from reality and behaves with absolute dominion, the very foundations of our life begin to crumble, for “instead of carrying out his role as a cooperator with God in the work of creation, man sets himself up in place of God and thus ends up provoking a rebellion on the part of nature (par. 117).

 

Accordingly, “there can be no renewal of our relationship with nature without a renewal of humanity itself.  There can be no ecology without an adequate anthropology” (Par. 118).

 

Is liberation from this dominant technocratic paradigm possible?  Yes, says Francis; We have the freedom needed to limit and direct technology; we can put it at the service of another type of progress, one which is healthier, more human, more social, more integral.”  In the attempt of “small producers to adopt less polluting means of production,” when technology is “directed to truly helping people live with more dignity and less suffering,” or when “the desire to create and contemplate beauty” results in the “kind of salvation which occurs in beauty and in those who behold it:”  Then “an authentic humanity, calling for a new synthesis, seems to dwell in the midst of our technological culture, almost unnoticed, like a mist seeping gently beneath a closed door.   Will the promise last,in spite of everything, with all that is authentic rising up in stubborn resistance?”  (Par. 112).  Or in the metaphor of our Gospel, will there be sufficient grain on the threshing floor to gather into the grainery?  Will there be a sustainable harvest?  Will there yet be reason for joy?

 

As key to the restoration of “our common home” Francis proposes an “Integral Ecology” on the basis of which we might recognize developments that legitimate a sturdy  “yes:”  “It cannot be emphasized enough,” he writes, “how everything is interconnected.”

 

Nature cannot be regarded as something separate from ourselves or as a mere setting in which we live.  We are part of nature, included in it and thus in constant interaction with it.  Recognizing the reasons why a given area is polluted requires a study of the workings of society, its economy, its behavior patterns, and the ways it grasps reality.  Given the scale of change, it is no longer possible to find a specific, discrete answer for each part of the problem.  It is essential to seek comprehensive solutions which consider the interactions within natural systems themselves and with social systems.  We are faced not with two separate crises, one environmental and the other social, but rather with one complex crisis which is both social and environmental. Strategies for a solution demand an integrated approach to combating poverty, restoring dignity to the excluded, and at the same time protecting nature. (Par. 139).

 

Recognition of the “intrinsic value independent of their usefulness” must be given to each organism and each harmonious ensemble of organisms, along with consideration of “each ecosystem's regenerative ability in its different area and aspects (Par 140).  With respect to economic growth, , the “protection of the environment is in fact 'an integral part of the development process and cannot be considered in isolation from it'”  “Analysis of environmental problems cannot be separated from the analysis of human, family, work-related and urban contexts, nor from how individuals relate to themselves, which leads in turn to how they relate to other and to the environment” (Par 140).  The leveling effect of the consumerist vision of human beings upon cultures must be resisted by care that is “flexible and dynamic”  (Par. 144).  An ecology of daily life will include “efforts to bring about an integral improvement in the quality of human life, and this entails considering the setting in which people live their lives” (Par. 147).  

 

Can we, will we, turn from despair to hope, will we leave fear behind to enter the grounds of rejoicing?  Franscis is confident that in the presence of Jesus, we can. 

 

Human beings, while capable of the worst, are also capable of rising above themselves, choosing again what is good, and making a new start, despite their mental and social conditioning.  We are able to take an honest look at ourselves, to acknowledge our deep dissatisfaction, and to embark on new paths to authentic freedom. (Par. 205).

 

This Sunday's gospel puts it plainly:  every tree “that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire (Luke 3:9).  “So what [we] all need”, Francis concludes, “is an 'ecological conversion,' whereby the effects of [our] encounter with Jesus Christ become evident in [our] relationship with the world around [us]. Living our vocation to be protectors of God's handiwork is essential to a life of virtue; it is not an optional or a secondary aspect of our Christian experience”  (Par. 217).  Such conversions entail a rich assembledge of attitudes:

 

First, it entails gratitude and gratuiousness, a recognition that the world is God's loving gift, and that we are called quietly to imitate his generosity in selfo-sacrifice and good works. . . It also entails a loving awareness that we are not disconnected from the rest of creatures, but joined in a splendid universal communion.  As believers, we do not look at the world from without but from within, conscious of the bonds with which the Father has linked us to all beings.  By developiong our individual, God-given capacities, an ecological conversion can inspire us to greatercreatively and enthusiasm in resolving the world's problems and in offering ourselves to God 'as a living sacrifice, hol and acceptable' (Rom 12:1) (Par. 220).

 

Each creature, we are aware, “reflect something of God and has a message to convey to us, and the security that Christ has taken unto himself this material world and now, risen, is intimately present to each being, surrounding it with his affection and penetrating it with his light” (Par 221). Himself at home in the creation no less than in the presence of God the Creator, he welcomes us and invites us to join him in its restoration.

 

A Petition for the Third Sunday of Advent

 

We rejoice in winter mornings. For a sun that rises later than those on which it shines, for ice that encourages careful steps, and for snow that makes streets and bike lanes impassible, we give you thanks. It is as if the whole creation has slowed to a gentler pace, ready to take only what it needs for the day and to receive the fullness of your beauty.

 

Hymn Suggestions for Third Sunday of Advent

Title

ELW

GTG

Other

Awake, Awake, and Greet the New Morn

242

107

 

Creating God, Your Fingers Trace

684

 

 

Creative God, You Spread the Earth

 

 

SWMN 25, CH 679

Everything Is One

 

 

EAS 42

God, Who Stretched the Spangled Heavens

771

24

 

He Comes To Us as One Unknown

737

 

 

Lord, Your Hands Have Formed This World

554

 

 

O Come, O Come, Emmanuel

257

88

 

Oh That I Had a Thousand Voices

833

16

 

People Look East

248

105

 

Rejoice, Rejoice, Believers

244

362

 

Seed that in Earth is Dying

330

 

 

Sing Praise to God, the Highest Good

871

 

 

The Mighty God with Power Speaks

 

13

 

 

Sources:

CH            Chalice Hymnal. St. Louis: Chalice Press, 1995

EAS          Earth and All Stars: Hymns and Songs for Young and Old. Herb Brokering. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 2003. (For Lois Brokering’s tune to “Everything Is One”, see Augsburg anthem 9781451482898)

ELW         Evangelical Lutheran Worship. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 2006.           

GTG         Glory to God: Hymns, Psalms, and Spiritual Songs. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2013.

SBL          Sent By the Lord: Songs of the World Church Vol. 2. The Iona Community, ed. John Bell. Chicago: GIA Publications, 1990

SWMN      Sing of the World Made New: Hymns of Justice, Peace, and Christian Responsibility. Carol Stream and Chicago, IL: Hope Publishing and GIA, 2014.

 

 

 

           

 

 

Comments